Alpha Doe
02-01-2011, 12:56 PM
Should we or could we control wildlife diseases through artificial means? If you had the choice what would you do? While reading the Hunter's Specialties website today I came across an interesting debate that is ongoing with HS, individual states and the FDA.
QUESTION: Are there any states that have banned the use of Vita-Rack on public lands?
ANSWER: No, except for Wisconsin. There's a question about it in Illinois that we're trying to get cleared-up. There's a moratorium for six months that started in September on using the Vita-Rack because of the Chronic Wasting Disease issue. We've contacted all the states and made the same case that we gave to the FDA as to why this product shouldn't be banned. If CWD becomes a problem across the country, the only way to fix it is through some type of medication you can make available to the deer. If you ban the deer's natural wild sites, you've defeated your purpose.
I'm not quite sure of the question about Illinois...The rule book clearly states it is unlawful to make available food, salt, mineral blocks or other products for ingestion by wild deer or other wildlife in areas where wild deer are present.
My question to you all...If CWD was affecting your wild deer population would you be in approval of using unnatural means to administer medication?
As far as Vita-Racks arguement as to why we should be allowed to use the products in areas that are suseptable to something such as CWD...I'm not sure as I would agree to their arguement. CWD is spread directly from one animal to another. Evidence also leads us to believe it it spread through the saliva. Vita-Rack explains on the website as to the importance of the deer saliva in the breaking down of the product. I understand the concept of administering a medication through the vit/mineral/attractant. But that seems to me to be about the same as making an alcoholic go to the bar for their meeting. Lets offer this vit/mineral supplement until the deer get the disease then they will be used to coming here and we will then administer the medication. (A medication that has not even been developed yet.)
QUESTION: Are there any states that have banned the use of Vita-Rack on public lands?
ANSWER: No, except for Wisconsin. There's a question about it in Illinois that we're trying to get cleared-up. There's a moratorium for six months that started in September on using the Vita-Rack because of the Chronic Wasting Disease issue. We've contacted all the states and made the same case that we gave to the FDA as to why this product shouldn't be banned. If CWD becomes a problem across the country, the only way to fix it is through some type of medication you can make available to the deer. If you ban the deer's natural wild sites, you've defeated your purpose.
I'm not quite sure of the question about Illinois...The rule book clearly states it is unlawful to make available food, salt, mineral blocks or other products for ingestion by wild deer or other wildlife in areas where wild deer are present.
My question to you all...If CWD was affecting your wild deer population would you be in approval of using unnatural means to administer medication?
As far as Vita-Racks arguement as to why we should be allowed to use the products in areas that are suseptable to something such as CWD...I'm not sure as I would agree to their arguement. CWD is spread directly from one animal to another. Evidence also leads us to believe it it spread through the saliva. Vita-Rack explains on the website as to the importance of the deer saliva in the breaking down of the product. I understand the concept of administering a medication through the vit/mineral/attractant. But that seems to me to be about the same as making an alcoholic go to the bar for their meeting. Lets offer this vit/mineral supplement until the deer get the disease then they will be used to coming here and we will then administer the medication. (A medication that has not even been developed yet.)